Comparison - Quub vs typical agency
Quub isn't for every project, and not every agency is Quub. Here are 9 concrete differences to decide without asking for a quote.
Point by point comparison
| Criterion | Quub | Typical agency |
|---|---|---|
| Point of contact | 1 person, the founder | Team (PM + dev) |
| Subcontracting | 0 | Partial or total (juniors, freelancers) |
| Hand-off sales → execution | None, founder ships | Present, PM hands off to dev |
| Scope | Locked after Discovery (1-2 weeks) | Often evolving mid-mission |
| Code ownership | Your GitHub from commit one | Delivered at end of project |
| Stack choice | Picked per project | Agency template often imposed |
| Post-launch support | 1 to 3 months included | Maintenance billed separately |
| Pricing | Public ranges on site | Opaque quote-based |
| Client demos | Every 2 weeks | Weekly via PM typically |
When to choose a typical agency
A typical agency makes sense for very large projects requiring 10+ people (designer + multiple devs + product + UX). Quub prefers to decline these missions rather than shipping them poorly. Not sure your project fits the Quub format? A discovery call clears it up quickly, with no commitment. To understand how Quub operates, see the process and pricing ranges.
Do you match one of these profiles?
If so, Quub has a dedicated page for your context.
Does your project fit the Quub format?